Erik Menendez has voiced strong objections to the depiction of his life in the series “Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story”. He describes the portrayal as filled with “blatant lies”.
Menendez, who, along with his brother Lyle, was convicted of the murders of their parents, has taken to social media to express his discontent. He argues that the show, co-created by Ryan Murphy and Ian Brennan, distorts the truth of their lives and experiences.
Erik Menendez has openly criticised the series for what he describes as a “dishonest portrayal” of the events surrounding the 1989 murders. Menendez and his brother claimed self-defence, citing years of abuse by their father. The show, however, presents a narrative that Menendez believes misrepresents their motivations and experiences.
Erik Menendez wrote, “It is with a heavy heart that I say, I believe Ryan Murphy cannot be this naïve and inaccurate about the facts of our lives so as to do this without bad intent.” He emphasised that the series regurgitates erroneous information from decades past.
He further questioned the necessity of altering or embellishing the truth for dramatic purposes, suggesting that the actual events are compelling enough. “Is the truth not enough? Let the truth stand as the truth,” he added.
@entertainmenttonight Ryan Murphy responds to Erik Menendez’s criticisms of his new crime anthology series, ‘Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story’ #ryanmurphy #monsters #erikmenendez #netflix
♬ original sound – Entertainment Tonight – Entertainment Tonight
Brennan added that the series focuses on understanding the abuse claims made by the Menendez brothers. He remarked, “Ultimately the truth of what happened is not knowable by anybody else, other than two people who are sitting in prison right now.”
The creators assert that they handled the subject matter with care and aimed to provide an honest depiction of the brothers’ accounts. This response suggests that the creators believe their series offers a balanced view of the events.
Erik Menendez reiterated his stance against violence, stating, “Violence is never an answer, never a solution, and is always tragic.” He emphasised that childhood trauma often leads to tragic outcomes that remain hidden until it is too late.
Through the ongoing dialogue, it is clear that the Menendez case remains a contentious and multifaceted issue. The series’ creators and the Menendez brothers themselves continue to offer contrasting views on the narrative presented to the public.
Erik Menendez’s allegations against the series highlight the complexities of portraying real-life events in media. The tension between staying true to facts and creating compelling drama remains a point of contention.
Ultimately, the differing perspectives on “Monsters” serve to remind us of the ongoing debate over the ethics of true crime storytelling. Both the producers and the Menendez brothers continue to stand firm in their respective views.
